Detroit’s Civil Society and the DIA
Religion & Liberty Online

Detroit’s Civil Society and the DIA

4109902429_491e5d15d3Photo Credit: Patrick Hoesly via Compfight cc

Following up on last week’s proposal and discussion about the future of the Detroit Institute of Arts in the midst of the city of Detroit’s ongoing budgetary woes, arts commentator Terry Teachout penned a piece for the WSJ about the need for Detroit’s leaders to step up: “Protecting Detroit’s Artwork Is a Job for Detroit.”

Among other things, Teachout writes, “Any argument to keep Detroit’s masterpieces in Detroit has got to make sense to Detroiters who think that pensions are more important than paintings.” Teachout goes on to explore a couple such arguments, but the most salient point is that Detroiters themselves are the best ones to make such arguments.

The ideal result of all this debate about the DIA would be if “a no-sale consensus emerges among Detroit’s leadership class, and if the smartest and most articulate members of that class can sell it to the public.” My take is slightly different: the “no sale” consensus should really be a “privatize locally” consensus.

I responded with my general agreement with Teachout on Twitter, including the caveat that it is perhaps more important for the leaders of civil society, particularly in the philanthropy world, to find that consensus than it is for the government leaders. To this Teachout writes, “Absolutely. In fact, it’s the civil-society ‘leaders’ whom I have in mind more than the government leaders.”

But if the city government leaders don’t come around, then the prospects for my localized privatization solution for the DIA are grim indeed. The consensus has to cut across the public and private sectors. It also needs to cut across the city’s borders, as one email response to last week’s commentary reminded me, since the DIA is a cultural treasure not only for the city, but indeed for the metro area, and the entire state itself.

Just don’t expect labor leaders to be much help in making the case: “The Van Gogh must go,” said Mark Young, president of the Detroit Lieutenants and Sergeants Association. “We don’t need Monet – we need money.”

But if Young and others like him get their way, maybe all the artwork sold off from the DIA can include the credit, “Imported from Detroit.”


Jordan J. Ballor

Jordan J. Ballor (Dr. theol., University of Zurich; Ph.D., Calvin Theological Seminary) is director of research at the Center for Religion, Culture & Democracy, an initiative of the First Liberty Institute. He has previously held research positions at the Acton Institute and Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, and has authored multiple books, including a forthcoming introduction to the public theology of Abraham Kuyper. Working with Lexham Press, he served as a general editor for the 12 volume Abraham Kuyper Collected Works in Public Theology series, and his research can be found in publications including Journal of Markets & Morality, Journal of Religion, Scottish Journal of Theology, Reformation & Renaissance Review, Journal of the History of Economic Thought, Faith & Economics, and Calvin Theological Journal. He is also associate director of the Junius Institute for Digital Reformation Research at Calvin Theological Seminary and the Henry Institute for the Study of Christianity & Politics at Calvin University.