About Events Publications Media Search Shop Donate
About Events Publications Media Search Shop Donate
What the Common Good Isn’t
Religion & Liberty Online

What the Common Good Isn’t

by Kenneth Spence • August 1, 2011

It looks like Congress will vote later today or this evening to raise the debt ceiling and avert a possible default by the United States Treasury. How the debt ceiling compromise will fair when measured against Acton’s Principles for Budget Reform it is too early to know, but one thing is certain: if the deal contains a single budget cut for even the most ineffective of social programs, we’ll hear screams of protest from Jim Wallis and his Circle of Protection.

Already parts of Washington are “livid over the extent of the deal’s domestic spending cuts, as well as the absence of any immediate tax hikes on wealthier Americans.” Coalitions that have a confused idea of the common good won’t like a debt deal that threatens to reflect economic realities and truths about the human person—and this plan doesn’t even have the support of many important conservatives.

As Jim Wallis explained the progressive Christian’s view of the debt negotiations:

Our country is in the midst of a clash between two competing moral visions, between those who believe in the common good, and those who believe individual good is the only good. A war has been declared on the poor…

Wallis reveals here a fundamental misunderstanding of the common good, and thus of politics. To Circle of Protection and its allies, the common good is achieved by higher taxation of the wealthy and redistribution of wealth: as everyone gets his check on the first of the month, justice is served. What redistributionists don’t understand is that simply running all the money through a common mill doesn’t mean you’re serving the common good. A large administrative state is not a sign of flourishing communal society.

An idea of the common good must be grounded in a correct vision of human nature, and the class warfare lens through which Wallis views the world distorts by materialism his perception. What is called the common good is in fact the common advantage, and belief in the common advantage is indeed belief that “individual good is the only good.”

Government for the sake of the common good requires a free citizenry, because without the freedom to make choices of moral consequence, a people cannot do good. Thus, taking the means of private charity and redistributing it for the sake of material equality is not practicing government for the common good.

Kenneth Spence

Kenneth Spence

Posted in News and EventsTagged catholic social teaching, circle of protection, common good, congress, debt, Goods, jim wallis, principles, Religion/Belief, sojourners

Related posts

  • Rev. Sirico: The Church as the Bride of Caesar
  • Circle of Protection Ads: A Telling Distortion of Scripture
  • Circle of Protection Subordinates Religion to Politics
  • Gerson on the Common Good

About

Our Mission & Core Principles Acton Grants and Awards Acton Research Our Team Careers Internships News

Events

Events Calendar Lecture Series Conference Series Acton University

Publications

Religion & Liberty Online Acton Notes Religion & Liberty Religion & Liberty Transatlantic Acton Books Journal of Markets & Morality

Multimedia

Videos Podcasts Films

Shop

Donate

Contact Us

© 2022 Acton Institute | Privacy Policy